Marketing to corporate career women is an issue I’ve wondered about for some time because of the general look and feel that the ad photos are meant to portray. There seems to be a view that embracing femininity and empowering a female persona equals looking sexy. I see a lot of pouts and big sexy bed hair and almost bare skin.
I believe that while subtle, classy sexiness is perfectly fine even in the workplace, in-your-face sexiness doesn’t work. It wouldn’t work for men either, so this has nothing to do with men telling us how to look credible in the workplace or that we need to conform to their thinking. Because the media has over-sexualized women’s bosoms, this is even more important to remember for bustier career women. It’s not just the men whose perspective of a busty woman is altered when she puts out a deliberately sexy image. It’s also the perspective of her female co-workers. With other women, it’s not an issue of envy. It’s just about what is classy and credible in the office.
I’m demonstrating this topic with some ads for bags. Some look very aspirational to my work persona and some too tacky, sexy or edgy. All the bags look amazing though!
Sure there are industries like the media, entertainment and other creative fields where the norms are a bit different. But this is true for both genders. In more conservative settings, let’s not forget that men often must wear a suit or at least a suit jacket and a shirt, and they are not given any options. So it’s not just women who need to conform to the corporate cultures. We at least have more choice than men!
Brands often put out an image to support their aspirational goals. If the target market is business women, it’s tricky to find the proper level of sexiness that is still aspirational but not over the top. This is especially true for global marketers because cultural norms also become a factor. In the USA, even a domestic brand faces cultural norms in this area.
Not particularly bust-related but definitely related to the idea of the aspirational dressing- awhile back Nordstrom came out with a catalog that was supposed to portray the glamorous nature of the collections side of the museum, but missed the mark by a wide margin. The model was supposed to be running inventory and unpacking an art exhibit… in strappy (and lucite-like) heels, short dresses, and evening gowns. Ignoring the dangerous and inappropriate behavior in the ad, as well as the clothing being well outside the average registrar’s budget, only one or two of the outfits could even be somewhat realistic. Instead of being aspirational, it’s become a joke (even DH who has only heard stories of museum life was laughing at it.)
I have made it my mission to check off items on my aspirational checklist. I have a purple version of that Michael Kors bag (scored on clearance). LOVE it. It it my go to weekend bag. It would be a work bag if it fit my clunky work laptop. That line is surprisingly versatile.
But I have this instead!
http://www.alesyabags.com/
^That bag rocks. Polished enough. Fits my laptop. And it fits all the other crap I can’t do without on a workday.
I have always aspired to that whole Grace Kelly/Jackie O sort of look. Not always there. But I keep striving. I seem to go for polished or teeny bopper.
I love Grace Kelly / Jackie O style and it’s so aspirational but have had to cave in because it’s not me unfortunately though I envy all those really well put together classy looking ladies. I just feel more like Joan Jett, Kate Moss, Grace Kelly mash inside 🙂