Yesterday I took a break at the grocery store to skim the May issue of O Magazine, and now I have a gripe to share with you. Tell me if you think I’m being oversensitive, but these excerpts from Florence Williams’ article “Breast Case Scenarios” do nothing to promote the body confidence of large-breasted women. It’s as if Williams, whose book called Breasts comes out in May, has assumed that all O Magazine readers are small-busted women insecure about their size.
According to the lingerie company Maidenform, the average breast size in the United States is 36C. A generation ago it was 34B. Before you celebrate, consider the causes. The breast growth is due in part to the fact that American women are plumper than ever. [Who trusts Maidenform’s data anymore? We’ve all heard different sizes touted as the current average breast size, but I tend to believe a 34D is more realistic than a 36C, which would negate the plumpness connection.]
While the age of menstruation has moved up several months in the past 40 years, breasts are appearing, on average, a full year sooner. Obesity is one likely reason. But certain chemicals that mimic estrogen may also be to blame . . . . [I suspect that her failure to point to any conclusive evidence that early developers tend to be obese is because no such evidence exists. Correct me if I’m wrong.]
Most men prefer smaller breasts than we think. Research has shown that women tend to overestimate the size that men find ideal. [And what exactly are those sizes?]
Big breasts on skinny bodies are quite unusual. Barbie’s proportions would be found in fewer than 1 in 100,000 women . . . . [But we all know that there is a large population of women without Barbie’s exact proportions who would be considered skinny with big breasts. It’s really not that unusual.]
Now let’s move on to the great bloggers out there who are grounded in the reality that full-busted women with small-to-average waists exist and who spend their time showing us how to embrace our shape instead of promoting a schadenfreude against small-busted women that Florence Williams insinuates against large-busted women in her article. (Again, feel free to tell me I’m being hypersensitive.)
1. Note the title of Imogen Lamport’s post: Tops to FLATTER a Large Bust. She’s not talking about hiding or minimizing here, which is why she can include the cowl-neck in her list. Cowl-necks have the potential to add volume, but there’s also the chance that a viewer may not be able to tell where the drape-iness ends and your bustline begins.
2. Have you always yearned for a delicate, sheer bra? Bras I Hate shows you how to get one by removing the extra lining. You’ll sacrifice some support, but if you’re just going for pretty, it’s a great solution (especially for those of us still waiting for the Claudette Dessous to come in our size).
3. Braless in Brasil’s Biu Biu order finally arrived, and her knit tops look great. See her review here. While you’re on her blog, also check out her ideas for how companies can begin to offer more sizes, a topic that is near and dear to my heart and that I will be exploring more on Hourglassy.
4. How many of Drueber und Drunter’s 9 common reactions have you experienced in trying to help other women discover the joy of a great-fitting bra? I love (and unfortunately relate) to her last one:
Me “BoobsblablabluppbrasblablablaBandsizecupsizeladiladila”. This does not work for me, mostly people just get annoyed.
5. Hopefully you’ve already discovered Busty Girl Comics after 12 Problems Busty Girls Have hit Buzzfeed last week. Later, someone tweeted that she’d forgotten #13–seatbelts! You’ve GOT to check out her clever BGC tee. It’s pretty much the worst possible neckline for us, but it certainly recognizes the reality of our shape in its design! I was also delighted to find Hourglassy listed in her resources for busty girls.
6. Finally, be sure to enter Stackdd’s Affinitas Spring Giveaway, and remember that tomorrow midnight (PDT) is your last chance to enter my Va Bien giveaway via Facebook and Pinterest.
Hey,
In regards to your question about obesity and earlier breast development… Factors that affect the onset of puberty are
1) Genetics, 2) Environment and 3) Nutrition.
The link between early onset of puberty (and hence earlier breast development) is due to increased nutrition. There’s a rough weight/body fat threshold of about 17% body fat for girls to start menstruating, which tends to be achieved earlier in girls that are obese. Additionally, being obese means that extra oestrogen can be manufactured from the fat within the body earlier – oestrogen is necessary for puberty and hence this occurs earlier along with breast development.
Hope that clears it up for you 🙂
Spud xxx
Thanks for providing this. I’d really like to see statistics showing the % of early developers that are obese.
Hi Darlene,
Thanks so much for your interest in my article and forthcoming book, BREASTS: A Natural and Unnatural History. Great discussion and I welcome the opportunity to state I’m a big fan of natural breasts of all sizes!
Re the puberty discussion, there has been a lot of research on the topic of BMI/obesity and pubertal timing. For example, in the Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology (2009 February ; 22(1): 3–6. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2008.12.003) the authors state:
“When examining the potential causes of the continued decrease in age of onset of puberty in girls, many have noted that there has been a coincident epidemic in rates and degrees of obesity. They concluded that increased body mass index (BMI) accounts for much of the change in age of onset of puberty in girls; the changes in pubertal onset, and association with increased BMI, are not as clear in boys.” The authors conclude that BMI together with chemicals in the environment are both likely responsible.
As I argue in my book, it’s not just diet that is changing breasts, but modern life in many aspects.
Love your blog!
Yrs,
Florence
Thanks so much for your response, Florence. I’m looking forward to reading your book next month.
Thanks for the mention! 😉
I have to say I fit pretty squarely in the “genetics” category considering all women on my mother’s side have large breast and if anything my mom had much larger breast than me before getting a reduction.
I’d love to see more of the research on growth hormones vs. childhood obesity. I have about zero expertise in that area but I’ve heard these theories before and have always wondered.
Not a fan of the anti-large breasts tone in the article. Yes, small-breasted definitely can and do have body image issues due to their breast size but I think it’s lost on so many that the same goes for large-breasted women. And in terms of what men want? I have yet to meet a man who is only considered about the size of a woman’s breasts (and maybe that’s a big red-flag for the relationship from the start!). Most men are interested in the whole package, the smile, her confidence, her intelligence and humor etc. It’s not like I picked my husband for the size of his pecs…
Also, I wish they’d stop throwing around these stats when nobody knows if any of these women are wearing the correct bra size in the first place! (goes and sulks in the corner now…)
Sulking in the corner w/ you!
I realized yesterday that I was making a connection that isn’t necessarily there between early puberty and larger breast size. I take it for granted that girls who develop early go on to develop large breasts. But that’s purely an assumption on my part. Does anyone have any knowledge on this subject?
That certainly wasn’t a feel-good read for busty ladies.
1. It doesn’t differentiate between band size and cup size. And it assumes all busty women are “plump”. What about small women who just happen to have big breasts? We’re not “Barbie”, but we have small body frames by most standards. We exist, so stop telling us that we don’t.
2. At least 80% of women wear wrong size bras, so how reliable is the average bra size figure, really? I think the real average bra size would have smaller band and bigger cup compared to the Maidenform data.
Can I join you in the sulking corner?